Filters
Brain vs. endocast: Does size differ? A unique experiment based on a cohort of 75 volunteers
AbstractResearch on brain evolution centres mainly on internal mouldings of the skull, known as endocasts; however, the relationship between the size and asymmetry of the brain and endocasts has been poorly investigated in humans. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to investigate whether endocasts can be reliable indicators of brain size and asymmetry. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of 75 participants was used to calculate the volume and surface area of the brain, the endocast, and their respective hemispheres. Two asymmetry indices (i.e. directional and absolute asymmetry) were used to assess the differences in volume and surface area between the sides of the brain and endocast. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationships between the parameters, and a Monte Carlo simulation for linear regression was performed to generate prediction equations for brain volume. The relationships between the level and direction of asymmetry indices were investigated using the Pearson correlation and McNemar's test, respectively. All correlations were statistically significant; however, correlation coefficients between volumes were stronger (0.894–0.931) than between volumes and surface areas (0.783–0.834). Brain volume can be predicted with high accuracy (ranging between 0.80 and 0.87) using the endocast total volume or the volume of one of the sides. The associations between the levels of asymmetry indices of the brain and endocast were non‐significant; however, the McNemar's test indicated that endocasts show the same left‐ or right‐biased asymmetry as the brain. This was the first study conducted on a large sample of brain and endocast data from the same individuals. The results demonstrated that brain volume can be accurately reconstructed using the volume of the endocast or one of its sides. This finding is especially important in the context of reconstructing fossil skulls, which are usually fragmented. Conversely, the asymmetry levels of endocast parameters are not reliable indicators of the actual level of brain volume asymmetry. Future research on fossils should focus on endocast asymmetry direction (left‐ or right‐biased) as this closely corresponds with brain lateralisation.
Variation in cross-sectional indicator of femoral robusticity in Homo sapiens and Neandertals
Abstract Variations in the cross-sectional properties of long bones are used to reconstruct the activity of human groups and differences in their respective habitual behaviors. Knowledge of what factors influence bone structure in Homo sapiens and Neandertals is still insufficient thus, this study investigated which biological and environmental variables influence variations in the femoral robusticity indicator of these two species. The sample consisted of 13 adult Neandertals from the Middle Paleolithic and 1959 adult individuals of H. sapiens ranging chronologically from the Upper Paleolithic to recent times. The femoral biomechanical properties were derived from the European data set, the subject literature, and new CT scans. The material was tested using a Mantel test and statistical models. In the models, the polar moment of area (J) was the dependent variable; sex, age, chronological period, type of lifestyle, percentage of the cortical area (%CA), the ratio of second moment areas of inertia about the X and Y axes (Ix/Iy), and maximum slope of the terrain were independent covariates. The Mantel tests revealed spatial autocorrelation of the femoral index in H. sapiens but not in Neandertals. A generalized additive mixed model showed that sex, %CA, Ix/Iy, chronological period, and terrain significantly influenced variation in the robusticity indicator of H. sapiens femora. A linear mixed model revealed that none of the analyzed variables correlated with the femoral robusticity indicator of Neandertals. We did not confirm that the gradual decline in the femoral robusticity indicator of H. sapiens from the Middle Paleolithic to recent times is related to the type of lifestyle; however, it may be associated with lower levels of mechanical loading during adolescence. The lack of correlation between the analysed variables and the indicator of femoral robusticity in Neandertals may suggest that they needed a different level of mechanical stimulus to produce a morphological response in the long bone than H. sapiens .
Publisher Correction: Variation in cross-sectional indicator of femoral robusticity in Homo sapiens and Neandertals
Abstract Variations in the cross-sectional properties of long bones are used to reconstruct the activity of human groups and differences in their respective habitual behaviors. Knowledge of what factors influence bone structure in Homo sapiens and Neandertals is still insufficient thus, this study investigated which biological and environmental variables influence variations in the femoral robusticity indicator of these two species. The sample consisted of 13 adult Neandertals from the Middle Paleolithic and 1959 adult individuals of H. sapiens ranging chronologically from the Upper Paleolithic to recent times. The femoral biomechanical properties were derived from the European data set, the subject literature, and new CT scans. The material was tested using a Mantel test and statistical models. In the models, the polar moment of area (J) was the dependent variable; sex, age, chronological period, type of lifestyle, percentage of the cortical area (%CA), the ratio of second moment areas of inertia about the X and Y axes (Ix/Iy), and maximum slope of the terrain were independent covariates. The Mantel tests revealed spatial autocorrelation of the femoral index in H. sapiens but not in Neandertals. A generalized additive mixed model showed that sex, %CA, Ix/Iy, chronological period, and terrain significantly influenced variation in the robusticity indicator of H. sapiens femora. A linear mixed model revealed that none of the analyzed variables correlated with the femoral robusticity indicator of Neandertals. We did not confirm that the gradual decline in the femoral robusticity indicator of H. sapiens from the Middle Paleolithic to recent times is related to the type of lifestyle; however, it may be associated with lower levels of mechanical loading during adolescence. The lack of correlation between the analysed variables and the indicator of femoral robusticity in Neandertals may suggest that they needed a different level of mechanical stimulus to produce a morphological response in the long bone than H. sapiens .
Frontal sinuses and human evolution
The frontal sinuses are cavities inside the frontal bone located at the junction between the face and the cranial vault and close to the brain. Despite a long history of study, understanding of their origin and variation through evolution is limited. This work compares most hominin species’ holotypes and other key individuals with extant hominids. It provides a unique and valuable perspective of the variation in sinuses position, shape, and dimensions based on a simple and reproducible methodology. We also observed a covariation between the size and shape of the sinuses and the underlying frontal lobes in hominin species from at least the appearance of Homo erectus . Our results additionally undermine hypotheses stating that hominin frontal sinuses were directly affected by biomechanical constraints resulting from either chewing or adaptation to climate. Last, we demonstrate their substantial potential for discussions of the evolutionary relationships between hominin species.