2024, Morasiewicz, Piotr, Leyko, Paweł, Tomczyk, Łukasz, Kazubski, Krystian

(1) Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of sex and age on the outcomes of hemiepiphysiodesis performed for genu valgum and varum deformity correction. (2) Methods: We analyzed patients who had undergone O-Plate hemiepiphysiodesis due to genu valgum or varum in the period of 2020–2023. The study group comprised 22 females and 20 males aged between 3 and 14 years at the time of surgery. Age-stratification yielded a subgroup of 3–10-year-olds (16 patients, 20 treated limbs) and a subgroup of 11–14-year-olds (26 patients, 28 treated limbs). We assessed the following parameters: hospital stay duration, deformity correction time, MAD correction, amount of angular correction, correction velocity, correction rate, complete deformity correction, deformity recurrence, surgery duration, and complications. (3) Results: The mean follow-up was 19 months. The mean surgery time in the subgroup of 3–10-year-olds (25.62 min) was significantly longer than that in the subgroup of 11–14-year-olds (22.81 min, p = 0.018). The mean deformity correction time in the male subgroup (11.33 months) was significantly shorter than that in the female subgroup (15.87 months, p = 0.013). A comparison of the subgroups stratified by age yielded a mean amount of angular correction of 10.5° in the younger children, which was significantly higher than that of 7.2° achieved in the older children; p = 0.027. The difference in mean correction velocity between 3–10-year-old children (4.03 mm/month) and that in 11–14-year-old children (1.39 mm/month) was statistically significant; p = 0.031. The mean rate of correction was 0.49°/month in females and 0.89°/month in males, with the latter rate significantly greater; p = 0.023. The difference in the mean rate of correction between the younger (1.08°/month) and the older subgroup (0.59°/month) was also significant; p = 0.018. A significant difference in terms of deformity recurrence rates was observed between the younger subgroup (66.67%) and older subgroup (only 10.53%); p = 0.005. (4) Conclusions: Patient sex had no significant effect on hemiepiphysiodesis outcomes; patient age has a considerable effect on hemiepiphysiodesis outcomes.

2025, Leyko, Paweł, Zaborska, Monika, Walczak, Agnieszka, Tomczyk, Łukasz, Pelc, Marcin, Mnich, Aleksander, Operacz, Radosław, Morasiewicz, Piotr

Background: Developmental knee joint deformities are a common problem in pediatric orthopedics. Children with a valgus or varus deformity of the distal femur or the proximal tibia are commonly treated with hemiepiphysiodesis. Gait analysis in patients with lower limb deformities plays an important role in clinical practice. The purpose of our study was to assess gait parameters in patients who underwent hemiepiphysiodesis procedures of the distal femur or proximal tibia due to a knee deformity and to compare them with those in healthy controls. Methods: We prospectively evaluated 35 patients (14 females and 21 males) after hemiepiphysiodesis and compared the results with a healthy control group (26 participants). Gait was analyzed with a G-Sensor device (BTS Bioengineering Corp., Quincy, MA, USA). We assessed the following gait parameters: gait cycle duration, step length, support phase duration, swing phase duration, double support duration, single support duration, cadence, velocity, and step length. We assessed these gait parameters in a group of patients before and after treatment with hemiepiphysiodesis. We compared the patients’ results before and after treatment to those of a healthy control group. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The mean follow-up period was 13 months. There was no difference in the results of gait assessments in patients prior to and after treatment. The median step length was 47.09% in the treated limb after treatment and 54.01% in the intact limb (p = 0.018). There were no other differences in gait parameters in the treated limbs and the healthy, intact limbs in the patient group after treatment. There were no significant differences in the patients before and after treatment compared with those in the healthy control group in all gait parameters. Conclusions: Valgus or varus knee deformity correction with the use of hemiepiphysiodesis does not significantly improve preoperative gait parameters. The biomechanical outcomes of hemiepiphysiodesis in the treatment of valgus or varus knee deformity are good. We observed no differences in gait cycle duration, step length, support phase duration, swing phase duration, double support duration, single support duration, gait velocity, cadence, or step length between the experimental and healthy control groups.