Active afforestation of drained peatlands is not a viable option under the EU Nature Restoration Law
2024, Jurasinski, Gerald, Barthelmes, Alexandra, Byrne, Kenneth A., Chojnicki, Bogdan, Christiansen, Jesper Riis, Decleer, Kris, Fritz, Christian, Günther, Anke Beate, Huth, Vytas, Joosten, Hans, Juszczak, Radosław, Juutinen, Sari, Kasimir, Åsa, Klemedtsson, Leif, Koebsch, Franziska, Kotowski, Wiktor, Kull, Ain, Lamentowicz, Mariusz, Lindgren, Amelie, Lindsay, Richard, Linkevičienė, Rita, Lohila, Annalea, Mander, Ülo, Manton, Michael, Minkkinen, Kari, Peters, Jan, Renou-Wilson, Florence, Sendžikaitė, Jūratė, Šimanauskienė, Rasa, Taminskas, Julius, Tanneberger, Franziska, Tegetmeyer, Cosima, van Diggelen, Rudy, Vasander, Harri, Wilson, David, Zableckis, Nerijus, Zak, Dominik H., Couwenberg, John
AbstractThe EU Nature Restoration Law (NRL) is critical for the restoration of degraded ecosystems and active afforestation of degraded peatlands has been suggested as a restoration measure under the NRL. Here, we discuss the current state of scientific evidence on the climate mitigation effects of peatlands under forestry. Afforestation of drained peatlands without restoring their hydrology does not fully restore ecosystem functions. Evidence on long-term climate benefits is lacking and it is unclear whether CO2 sequestration of forest on drained peatland can offset the carbon loss from the peat over the long-term. While afforestation may offer short-term gains in certain cases, it compromises the sustainability of peatland carbon storage. Thus, active afforestation of drained peatlands is not a viable option for climate mitigation under the EU Nature Restoration Law and might even impede future rewetting/restoration efforts. Instead, restoring hydrological conditions through rewetting is crucial for effective peatland restoration.
Ericoid shrub encroachment shifts aboveground–belowground linkages in three peatlands across Europe and Western Siberia
2023, Buttler, Alexandre, Bragazza, Luca, Laggoun‐Défarge, Fatima, Gogo, Sebastien, Toussaint, Marie‐Laure, Lamentowicz, Mariusz, Chojnicki, Bogdan, Słowiński, Michał, Słowińska, Sandra, Zielińska, Małgorzata, Reczuga, Monika, Barabach, Jan, Marcisz, Katarzyna, Lamentowicz, Łukasz, Harenda, Kamila, Lapshina, Elena, Gilbert, Daniel, Schlaepfer, Rodolphe, Jassey, Vincent E. J.
AbstractIn northern peatlands, reduction of Sphagnum dominance in favour of vascular vegetation is likely to influence biogeochemical processes. Such vegetation changes occur as the water table lowers and temperatures rise. To test which of these factors has a significant influence on peatland vegetation, we conducted a 3‐year manipulative field experiment in Linje mire (northern Poland). We manipulated the peatland water table level (wet, intermediate and dry; on average the depth of the water table was 17.4, 21.2 and 25.3 cm respectively), and we used open‐top chambers (OTCs) to create warmer conditions (on average increase of 1.2°C in OTC plots compared to control plots). Peat drying through water table lowering at this local scale had a larger effect than OTC warming treatment per see on Sphagnum mosses and vascular plants. In particular, ericoid shrubs increased with a lower water table level, while Sphagnum decreased. Microclimatic measurements at the plot scale indicated that both water‐level and temperature, represented by heating degree days (HDDs), can have significant effects on the vegetation. In a large‐scale complementary vegetation gradient survey replicated in three peatlands positioned along a transitional oceanic–continental and temperate–boreal (subarctic) gradient (France–Poland–Western Siberia), an increase in ericoid shrubs was marked by an increase in phenols in peat pore water, resulting from higher phenol concentrations in vascular plant biomass. Our results suggest a shift in functioning from a mineral‐N‐driven to a fungi‐mediated organic‐N nutrient acquisition with shrub encroachment. Both ericoid shrub encroachment and higher mean annual temperature in the three sites triggered greater vascular plant biomass and consequently the dominance of decomposers (especially fungi), which led to a feeding community dominated by nematodes. This contributed to lower enzymatic multifunctionality. Our findings illustrate mechanisms by which plants influence ecosystem responses to climate change, through their effect on microbial trophic interactions.