Active afforestation of drained peatlands is not a viable option under the EU Nature Restoration Law
Type
Journal article
Language
English
Date issued
2024
Author
Jurasinski, Gerald
Barthelmes, Alexandra
Byrne, Kenneth A.
Christiansen, Jesper Riis
Decleer, Kris
Fritz, Christian
Günther, Anke Beate
Huth, Vytas
Joosten, Hans
Juutinen, Sari
Kasimir, Åsa
Klemedtsson, Leif
Koebsch, Franziska
Kotowski, Wiktor
Kull, Ain
Lamentowicz, Mariusz
Lindgren, Amelie
Lindsay, Richard
Linkevičienė, Rita
Lohila, Annalea
Mander, Ülo
Manton, Michael
Minkkinen, Kari
Peters, Jan
Renou-Wilson, Florence
Sendžikaitė, Jūratė
Šimanauskienė, Rasa
Taminskas, Julius
Tanneberger, Franziska
Tegetmeyer, Cosima
van Diggelen, Rudy
Vasander, Harri
Wilson, David
Zableckis, Nerijus
Zak, Dominik H.
Couwenberg, John
Faculty
Wydział Inżynierii Środowiska i Inżynierii Mechanicznej
Journal
Ambio
ISSN
0044-7447
Volume
53
Number
7
Pages from-to
970-983
Abstract (EN)
The EU Nature Restoration Law (NRL) is critical for the restoration of degraded ecosystems and active afforestation of degraded peatlands has been suggested as a restoration measure under the NRL. Here, we discuss the current state of scientific evidence on the climate mitigation effects of peatlands under forestry. Afforestation of drained peatlands without restoring their hydrology does not fully restore ecosystem functions. Evidence on long-term climate benefits is lacking and it is unclear whether CO2 sequestration of forest on drained peatland can offset the carbon loss from the peat over the long-term. While afforestation may offer short-term gains in certain cases, it compromises the sustainability of peatland carbon storage. Thus, active afforestation of drained peatlands is not a viable option for climate mitigation under the EU Nature Restoration Law and might even impede future rewetting/restoration efforts. Instead, restoring hydrological conditions through rewetting is crucial for effective peatland restoration.
License
CC-BY - Attribution
Open access date
May 2, 2024