Szanowni Państwo, w związku z bardzo dużą ilością zgłoszeń, rejestracją danych w dwóch systemach bibliograficznych, a jednocześnie zmniejszonym zespołem redakcyjnym proces rejestracji i redakcji opisów publikacji jest wydłużony. Bardzo przepraszamy za wszelkie niedogodności i dziękujemy za Państwa wyrozumiałość.
Repository logoRepository logoRepository logoRepository logo
Repository logoRepository logoRepository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Employees
  • AAAHigh contrastHigh contrast
    EN PL
    • Log In
      Have you forgotten your password?
AAAHigh contrastHigh contrast
EN PL
  • Log In
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Bibliografia UPP
  3. Bibliografia UPP
  4. Mapping ways of detecting and handling antimicrobial residues in pigs and pig meat in- and outside Europe
 
Full item page
Options

Mapping ways of detecting and handling antimicrobial residues in pigs and pig meat in- and outside Europe

Type
Journal article
Language
English
Date issued
2023
Author
Alban, L.
Antunović, B.
Belous, M.
Bonardi, S.
García-Gimeno, R.M.
Jenson, I.
Kautto, A.H.
Majewski, Michał 
Oorburg, D.
Sakaridis, I.
Sirbu, A.
Vieira-Pinto, M.
Vågsholm, I.
Bērziņš, A.
Petersen, J.V.
Faculty
Wydział Medycyny Weterynaryjnej i Nauk o Zwierzętach
Journal
Food Control
ISSN
0956-7135
DOI
10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109899
Web address
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713523002992
Volume
153
Number
November 2023
Pages from-to
art. 109899
Abstract (EN)
Withdrawal periods after antimicrobial treatment have been defined as preventing in meat the presence of residues above the maximum residue limits (MRLs). However, errors can lead to residues above MRLs. The RIBMINS COST Action network investigated the question of how detection and handling are applied in different countries, and what the best practices may be, when balancing consumer safety with EU policy on minimising food waste. Two questionnaires were developed focusing on pigs, targeting the competent authority and the food business operator. The survey was undertaken in spring 2022 and resulted in 78 answers representing 27 countries. The results showed that most countries operate their system as a kind of monitoring, where the tested carcass is not detained. We suggest two best practice models where Model A (monitoring) could reflect small abattoirs placing meat on the national market, whereas Model B (surveillance) could reflect abattoirs also trading and exporting. In Model A, detection of a residue above the MRL is interpreted in the same way as a process hygiene criterion, requires on-farm inspection to correct mistakes only, and therefore no retention of tested carcases. In Model B, detection of a residue above the MRL is interpreted as a food safety criterion, requires on-farm inspection and the tested carcass is retained to avoid expensive recalls in case residues are found.
Keywords (EN)
  • veterinary public health

  • monitoring

  • antibiotics

  • pork

  • food waste

  • residues

  • risk management

License
cc-bycc-by CC-BY - Attribution
Open access date
June 11, 2023
Fundusze Europejskie
  • About repository
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies

Copyright 2025 Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu

DSpace Software provided by PCG Academia