Simple item page
 

Comparison of Different Solid-Phase Microextraction Formats Dedicated to the Analysis of Volatile Compounds - A Comprehensive Study

cris.lastimport.scopus2025-10-23T06:55:01Z
dc.abstract.enThe coupling of Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) technology with gas chromatography (GC) has a well-established and successful history. Traditionally, SPME fibers have been the most popular form thanks to their versatility and the ease with which they can be fully automated. However, alternative geometries for SPME have been developed over the years, beginning with Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE) and later evolving into Thin-Film SPME (TF-SPME) devices. Each of these formats offers distinct advantages and disadvantages, which are explored in this study. The primary objective of this study was to comprehensively compare available forms of SPME devices, with a special focus on the advantages of TF-SPME, a novel microextraction method particularly suited for the analysis of odorants in food. The study involved analyzing a standard mixture of 11 keyfood odorants, representing a range of polarities, to evaluate the efficiency of TF-SPME devices in terms of the number of analytes extracted. Furthermore, four types of TF-SPME devices were compared against each other in both standard mixtures and actual food samples. The final stage of the study employed GCxGC-ToFMS analysis to showcase the potential of the most efficient HLB-TF SPMEdevice in the non-targeted analysis of complex samples, exemplified by unfiltered wheat beer. This analysis demonstrated the significant capability of HLB-TF-SPME in capturing and identifying a wide range of volatile compounds in complex matrices.
dc.affiliationWydział Nauk o Żywności i Żywieniu
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Technologii Żywności Pochodzenia Roślinnego
dc.contributor.authorWieczorek, Martyna Natalia
dc.date.access2024-11-14
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-14T10:09:41Z
dc.date.available2024-11-14T10:09:41Z
dc.date.copyright2024-10-30
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>The coupling of Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) technology with gas chromatography (GC) has a well-established and successful history. Traditionally, SPME fibers have been the most popular form thanks to their versatility and the ease with which they can be fully automated. However, alternative geometries for SPME have been developed over the years, beginning with Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE) and later evolving into Thin-Film SPME (TF-SPME) devices. Each of these formats offers distinct advantages and disadvantages, which are explored in this study. The primary objective of this study was to comprehensively compare available forms of SPME devices, with a special focus on the advantages of TF-SPME, a novel microextraction method particularly suited for the analysis of odorants in food. The study involved analyzing a standard mixture of 11 key food odorants, representing a range of polarities, to evaluate the efficiency of TF-SPME devices in terms of the number of analytes extracted. Furthermore, four types of TF-SPME devices were compared against each other in both standard mixtures and actual food samples. The final stage of the study employed GCxGC-ToFMS analysis to showcase the potential of the most efficient HLB-TF-SPME device in the non-targeted analysis of complex samples, exemplified by unfiltered wheat beer. This analysis demonstrated the significant capability of HLB-TF-SPME in capturing and identifying a wide range of volatile compounds in complex matrices.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.bibliographyil., bibliogr.
dc.description.financepublication_nocost
dc.description.financecost0,00
dc.description.if4,2
dc.description.number21
dc.description.points140
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume29
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/molecules29215137
dc.identifier.issn1420-3049
dc.identifier.urihttps://sciencerep.up.poznan.pl/handle/item/2013
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/29/21/5137
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofMolecules
dc.relation.pagesart. 5137
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.sciencecloudnosend
dc.share.typeOPEN_JOURNAL
dc.subject.enTF-SPME
dc.subject.enodorants
dc.subject.enextraction
dc.titleComparison of Different Solid-Phase Microextraction Formats Dedicated to the Analysis of Volatile Compounds - A Comprehensive Study
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue21
oaire.citation.volume29