Climate Change Science and Policy—A Guided Tour across the Space of Attitudes and Outcomes

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-3579-5072
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-8989-0761
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-5305-1045
cris.virtual.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-1225-9170
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-4070-6553
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid0d6b44ae-5d2d-45e8-a6a0-57dbe0d687ce
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid8e9590fe-311c-4187-9bc5-d31340640802
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidaf3d5ff9-4724-46db-855d-91b429dae19a
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid454d47d0-3892-4b3a-a5c3-927100a1f1db
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidb7faa967-5967-4712-8dca-a56013492f1d
dc.abstract.enThe ongoing debate on global climate change has polarized societies since ever. The attitude of an individual towards its anthropogenic nature as well as the need and extent to which human beings should mitigate climate warming can result from a number of factors. Also, since the consequences of such alteration in global climate have no borders and became much more severe in the last decades, it is worth it to shed some more light on a current state of an interplay between scientific findings and climate policies. In this paper, we examine a low-dimensional space of possible attitudes toward climate change, its impact, attribution, and mitigation. Insights into those attitudes and evidence-based interpretations are offered. We review a range of inconvenient truths and convenient untruths, respectively, related to fundamental climate-change issues and derive a systematic taxonomy of climate-change skepticism. In addition, the media track related to climate change is reconstructed by examining a range of cover stories of important magazines and the development of those stories with global warming. In a second major step, we span a low-dimensional space of outcomes of the combined climate science-policy system, where each of the sub-systems may either succeed or fail. We conclude that the most probable outcome from today’s perspective is still the same as it was 12 years ago: a tragic triumph, i.e., the success of climate science and the simultaneous failure of climate policy.
dc.affiliationWydział Inżynierii Środowiska i Inżynierii Mechanicznej
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Budownictwa i Geoinżynierii
dc.contributor.authorKundzewicz, Zbigniew W.
dc.contributor.authorChoryński, Adam
dc.contributor.authorOlejnik, Janusz
dc.contributor.authorSchellnhuber, Hans J.
dc.contributor.authorUrbaniak, Marek
dc.contributor.authorZiemblińska, Klaudia
dc.date.access2025-11-03
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-04T13:05:19Z
dc.date.available2025-11-04T13:05:19Z
dc.date.copyright2023-03-18
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>The ongoing debate on global climate change has polarized societies since ever. The attitude of an individual towards its anthropogenic nature as well as the need and extent to which human beings should mitigate climate warming can result from a number of factors. Also, since the consequences of such alteration in global climate have no borders and became much more severe in the last decades, it is worth it to shed some more light on a current state of an interplay between scientific findings and climate policies. In this paper, we examine a low-dimensional space of possible attitudes toward climate change, its impact, attribution, and mitigation. Insights into those attitudes and evidence-based interpretations are offered. We review a range of inconvenient truths and convenient untruths, respectively, related to fundamental climate-change issues and derive a systematic taxonomy of climate-change skepticism. In addition, the media track related to climate change is reconstructed by examining a range of cover stories of important magazines and the development of those stories with global warming. In a second major step, we span a low-dimensional space of outcomes of the combined climate science-policy system, where each of the sub-systems may either succeed or fail. We conclude that the most probable outcome from today’s perspective is still the same as it was 12 years ago: a tragic triumph, i.e., the success of climate science and the simultaneous failure of climate policy.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.bibliographyil., bibliogr.
dc.description.financepublication_nocost
dc.description.financecost0,00
dc.description.if3,3
dc.description.number6
dc.description.points100
dc.description.reviewreview
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume15
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su15065411
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttps://sciencerep.up.poznan.pl/handle/item/5729
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5411
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofSustainability
dc.relation.pagesart. 5411
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.sciencecloudnosend
dc.share.typeOPEN_JOURNAL
dc.subject.enclimate change
dc.subject.enclimate science
dc.subject.enpolicy
dc.subject.ensociety
dc.subject.enattitudes
dc.titleClimate Change Science and Policy—A Guided Tour across the Space of Attitudes and Outcomes
dc.title.volumeSpecial Issue Climate Change and Its Consequences: Revising the Challenge and Undertaken Activities to Reach Climate Resilience
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue6
oaire.citation.volume15