The Nitrogen Fixation and Yielding of Pea in Different Soil Tillage Systems

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-6908-2812
cris.virtual.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-6447-9557
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-2358-9068
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-4465-9697
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-5433-583X
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid3ea7a888-8c5d-44e0-9b08-0486dff04861
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid23ce9924-fa6e-453a-8476-1ac29fb10e13
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidd32ae288-443c-48d5-a13c-74de2fe7037f
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidad982135-5e5a-49ac-86d0-5a666c1023cb
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid802dd3b9-1ad2-473a-bc75-4ae5eaf4ff47
dc.abstract.enThe field experiment was carried out in 2013 and 2014 as part of a long-term experiment to test the influence of different soil tillage systems (conventional, reduced, direct sowing) on (a) the yield of summer pea (Pisum sativum L.) and (b) the amount of biologically reduced atmospheric nitrogen (N), which was determined using the 15N dilution method (ID15N). Spring barley was used as a reference plant. Climatic conditions did not have a significant influence on the yield of pea seeds (mean value 4.56 t ha−1), post-harvest residues (3.76 t ha−1) and total biomass (8.33 t ha−1). Soil tillage system was found to have a significant impact on all components of the pea yield in years of experiment, with the highest average seed yield values observed with the conventional system (5.19 t ha−1) and significantly lower values observed with reduced tillage (4.34 t ha−1) and direct sowing (4.17 t ha−1). The content of total N was greatest in the pea biomass that was harvested in the conventional system (202 kg ha−1) and lowest with direct sowing (155 kg ha−1). Nitrogen accumulated in the pea seeds from three sources: atmosphere (mean value 35.2%), fertilizers (6.8%) and soil (57.9%), equating to 48.6, 9.9, and 85.4 kg ha−1, respectively. Soil tillage system was found to have a significant impact on the amount of N that was fixed from the atmosphere by the peas: 17.7% in conventional tillage, 37.9 in reduced system and 50.2% in direct sowing, which equates to a harvested seed yield of 28.9, 52.0 and 64.4 kg ha−1, respectively. In the post-harvest residues, the amount of N fixed from the atmosphere by the pea crop was also modified by the soil tillage system in range: 20.2% in conventional tillage and 32.6% in direct sowing (which equates to 7.4 and 8.5 kg N ha−1, respectively), but the difference was not significant.
dc.affiliationWydział Rolnictwa, Ogrodnictwa i Bioinżynierii
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Agronomii
dc.contributor.authorFaligowska, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.authorKalembasa, Stanisław
dc.contributor.authorKalembasa, Dorota
dc.contributor.authorPanasiewicz, Katarzyna
dc.contributor.authorSzymańska, Grażyna
dc.contributor.authorRatajczak, Karolina
dc.contributor.authorSkrzypczak, Grzegorz Antoni
dc.date.access2025-12-10
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-12T08:33:40Z
dc.date.available2025-12-12T08:33:40Z
dc.date.copyright2022-01-30
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>The field experiment was carried out in 2013 and 2014 as part of a long-term experiment to test the influence of different soil tillage systems (conventional, reduced, direct sowing) on (a) the yield of summer pea (Pisum sativum L.) and (b) the amount of biologically reduced atmospheric nitrogen (N), which was determined using the 15N dilution method (ID15N). Spring barley was used as a reference plant. Climatic conditions did not have a significant influence on the yield of pea seeds (mean value 4.56 t ha−1), post-harvest residues (3.76 t ha−1) and total biomass (8.33 t ha−1). Soil tillage system was found to have a significant impact on all components of the pea yield in years of experiment, with the highest average seed yield values observed with the conventional system (5.19 t ha−1) and significantly lower values observed with reduced tillage (4.34 t ha−1) and direct sowing (4.17 t ha−1). The content of total N was greatest in the pea biomass that was harvested in the conventional system (202 kg ha−1) and lowest with direct sowing (155 kg ha−1). Nitrogen accumulated in the pea seeds from three sources: atmosphere (mean value 35.2%), fertilizers (6.8%) and soil (57.9%), equating to 48.6, 9.9, and 85.4 kg ha−1, respectively. Soil tillage system was found to have a significant impact on the amount of N that was fixed from the atmosphere by the peas: 17.7% in conventional tillage, 37.9 in reduced system and 50.2% in direct sowing, which equates to a harvested seed yield of 28.9, 52.0 and 64.4 kg ha−1, respectively. In the post-harvest residues, the amount of N fixed from the atmosphere by the pea crop was also modified by the soil tillage system in range: 20.2% in conventional tillage and 32.6% in direct sowing (which equates to 7.4 and 8.5 kg N ha−1, respectively), but the difference was not significant.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.bibliographyil., bibliogr.
dc.description.financepublication_nocost
dc.description.financecost0,00
dc.description.if3,7
dc.description.number2
dc.description.points100
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume12
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agronomy12020352
dc.identifier.issn2073-4395
dc.identifier.urihttps://sciencerep.up.poznan.pl/handle/item/6369
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/2/352
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofAgronomy
dc.relation.pagesart. 352
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.sciencecloudnosend
dc.share.typeOPEN_JOURNAL
dc.subject.en15N isotope
dc.subject.enlegumes
dc.subject.enbiological nitrogen fixation
dc.subject.ennitrogen balance
dc.subject.enyield
dc.titleThe Nitrogen Fixation and Yielding of Pea in Different Soil Tillage Systems
dc.title.volumeSpecial Issue Sustainable Tillage and Sowing Technologies
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.volume12