Application of edgeR and DESeq2 methods in plant experiments based on RNA-seq technology

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-6553-6023
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-1806-0891
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-9465-3851
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-5550-7007
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid024ca314-91a3-4ea2-87e2-ae22717d7389
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid6a2f8857-003b-41ec-9112-0ef6941bfd06
cris.virtualsource.author-orcida96d2343-ee65-450d-8ce2-355a51255d10
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidb7671e1c-9850-4ccf-9eeb-882ff1d3c932
dc.abstract.enWe compared two of the most common methods for differential expression analysis in the RNA-seq field: edgeR and DESeq2. We evaluated these methods based on four real RNA-seq plant datasets. The results indicate that there is a large number of joint differentially expressed genes between the two methods. However, depending on the research goal and the preparation of an experiment, different approaches to statistical analysis and interpretation of the results can be suggested. We focus on answering the question: what workflow should be used in the statistical analysis of the datasets under consideration to minimize the number of falsely identified differentially expressed genes?
dc.affiliationWydział Rolnictwa, Ogrodnictwa i Bioinżynierii
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych
dc.contributor.authorNiedziela, Grażyna
dc.contributor.authorSzabelska-Beręsewicz, Alicja
dc.contributor.authorZyprych-Walczak, Joanna Grażyna
dc.contributor.authorGraczyk, Małgorzata
dc.date.access2025-11-12
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-12T09:53:03Z
dc.date.available2025-11-12T09:53:03Z
dc.date.copyright2022-12-30
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstract<jats:title>Summary</jats:title> <jats:p>We compared two of the most common methods for differential expression analysis in the RNA-seq field: edgeR and DESeq2. We evaluated these methods based on four real RNA-seq plant datasets. The results indicate that there is a large number of joint differentially expressed genes between the two methods. However, depending on the research goal and the preparation of an experiment, different approaches to statistical analysis and interpretation of the results can be suggested. We focus on answering the question: what workflow should be used in the statistical analysis of the datasets under consideration to minimize the number of falsely identified differentially expressed genes?</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.bibliographyil., bibliogr.
dc.description.financepublication_nocost
dc.description.financecost0,00
dc.description.number2
dc.description.points20
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume59
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/bile-2022-0009
dc.identifier.eissn2199-577X
dc.identifier.issn1896-3811
dc.identifier.urihttps://sciencerep.up.poznan.pl/handle/item/5836
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://reference-global.com/article/10.2478/bile-2022-0009
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofBiometrical Letters
dc.relation.pages127-139
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.sciencecloudnosend
dc.share.typeOPEN_JOURNAL
dc.subject.enedgeR
dc.subject.enDESeq2
dc.subject.enRNA-seq
dc.subject.enstatistical methods for differential analysis
dc.titleApplication of edgeR and DESeq2 methods in plant experiments based on RNA-seq technology
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.volume59