Effects of modelling studies on controlled drainage in agricultural land on reduction of outflow and nitrate losses–a meta-analysis

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-0893-6538
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-2819-2644
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-7940-4312
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid6cf82590-6077-453f-8a4c-d9ec20134fd7
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidd6213900-7cb6-47c7-a5c6-2232adef45bf
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid4e05d7ee-f3d8-4d63-b989-c872dea972e0
dc.abstract.enA review with meta-analysis of outflow and nitrate loss reduction in controlled drainage (CD) vs conventional, free drainage (FD) was carried out in the study. Since the results of experimental field studies usually cover short periods of data collection, hence in this paper, meta-analyses were based on model studies that usually cover a longer time range. The databases Web of Science and Scopus were searched for eligible English articles, published until December 2020, that describe the quantity and quality of drainage water. The meta-analysis of outflow and nitrate loss reduction in CD vs FD using the mean difference (MD) with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. The influence of each study was measured through heterogeneity, sensitivity analyses and publication bias using STATISTICA (version 13.3) for all analyses. Of the 107 works identified, 18 were finally included in the analysis based on established criteria required for an appropriate meta-analysis. In general the results indicate a reduction in average drainage outflow of 30.5% (MD = -71.26 mm; 95% CI, -103.49 –-39.04; p = 0.000) in arable land with CD in comparison to FD practice. In the case of nitrate load the reduction was 33.61% and in the drainage water there was lower content in CD practice by an average of 8.36 kg NO3 ha-1year-1 (95% CI, -9.93 –-6.79; p = 0.000). Subgroup analysis of two meta-analyses indicates that the results concerning these associations may vary with the calculated weight for each article, in which the number of years of study had the most significant impact.
dc.affiliationWydział Inżynierii Środowiska i Inżynierii Mechanicznej
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Melioracji, Kształtowania Środowiska i Gospodarki Przestrzennej
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Gleboznawstwa, Rekultywacji i Geodezji
dc.contributor.authorKęsicka, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorStasik, Rafał
dc.contributor.authorKozłowski, Michał
dc.date.access2026-03-17
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-25T08:31:52Z
dc.date.available2026-03-25T08:31:52Z
dc.date.copyright2022-04-28
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>A review with meta-analysis of outflow and nitrate loss reduction in controlled drainage (CD) vs conventional, free drainage (FD) was carried out in the study. Since the results of experimental field studies usually cover short periods of data collection, hence in this paper, meta-analyses were based on model studies that usually cover a longer time range. The databases Web of Science and Scopus were searched for eligible English articles, published until December 2020, that describe the quantity and quality of drainage water. The meta-analysis of outflow and nitrate loss reduction in CD vs FD using the mean difference (MD) with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. The influence of each study was measured through heterogeneity, sensitivity analyses and publication bias using STATISTICA (version 13.3) for all analyses. Of the 107 works identified, 18 were finally included in the analysis based on established criteria required for an appropriate meta-analysis. In general the results indicate a reduction in average drainage outflow of 30.5% (MD = -71.26 mm; 95% CI, -103.49 –-39.04; p = 0.000) in arable land with CD in comparison to FD practice. In the case of nitrate load the reduction was 33.61% and in the drainage water there was lower content in CD practice by an average of 8.36 kg NO<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>year<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup> (95% CI, -9.93 –-6.79; p = 0.000). Subgroup analysis of two meta-analyses indicates that the results concerning these associations may vary with the calculated weight for each article, in which the number of years of study had the most significant impact.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.bibliographyil., bibliogr.
dc.description.financepublication_nocost
dc.description.financecost0,00
dc.description.if3,7
dc.description.number4
dc.description.points100
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume17
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0267736
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://sciencerep.up.poznan.pl/handle/item/7925
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267736
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE
dc.relation.pagese0267736
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.sciencecloudnosend
dc.share.typeOPEN_JOURNAL
dc.titleEffects of modelling studies on controlled drainage in agricultural land on reduction of outflow and nitrate losses–a meta-analysis
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.volume17