Simple item page
 

Urban visual pollution: comparison of two ways of evaluation - a case study from Europe

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-9879-3683
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-0929-5285
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-0655-9820
cris.virtual.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidca072ee5-5e34-4a46-8369-e7963fb188c0
cris.virtualsource.author-orcida59124fb-16e6-4640-b90f-907536b11f95
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid77030be3-9caf-4e45-95a9-fd6a80b76230
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.abstract.enVisual pollution by outdoor advertisements (OAs) of the urban landscape in the old town of Gniezno city (Poland) was the main aim of the presented work. For this purpose, the part of Warszawska Street located near the old market was selected. The detailed objective of the work was to evaluate the effect of OA on the building perception and compare two different methods to check the possibility of their interchangeably potential. The city audit and public opinion about selected buildings were performed. The photographs with and without OAs were also analyzed. The statistical analysis was performed to find the significant differences between these two methods and define differences between groups of respondents. In general, the results revealed the strong effect of the building quality (condition and appearance of the building) on the final score of the building perception. This was valid for both evaluation methods. The significant differences between building perception with and without OAs and groups of respondents were found only for the building with good facade quality. While, in the case of low-quality buildings the perception of the urban landscape was low regardless of the presence of OAs. Moreover, we can primarily conclude that city audit and survey of public opinion can be used interchangeably.
dc.affiliationWydział Inżynierii Środowiska i Inżynierii Mechanicznej
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Ekologii i Ochrony Środowiska
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Budownictwa i Geoinżynierii
dc.contributor.authorBorowiak, Klaudia
dc.contributor.authorBudka, Anna
dc.contributor.authorLisiak-Zielińska, Marta
dc.contributor.authorRobaszkiewicz, Kinga
dc.contributor.authorCakaj, Arlinda
dc.contributor.authorAgaj, Tropikë
dc.date.access2025-05-14
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-13T07:04:02Z
dc.date.available2025-08-13T07:04:02Z
dc.date.copyright2024-03-13
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstract<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Visual pollution by outdoor advertisements (OAs) of the urban landscape in the old town of Gniezno city (Poland) was the main aim of the presented work. For this purpose, the part of Warszawska Street located near the old market was selected. The detailed objective of the work was to evaluate the effect of OA on the building perception and compare two different methods to check the possibility of their interchangeably potential. The city audit and public opinion about selected buildings were performed. The photographs with and without OAs were also analyzed. The statistical analysis was performed to find the significant differences between these two methods and define differences between groups of respondents. In general, the results revealed the strong effect of the building quality (condition and appearance of the building) on the final score of the building perception. This was valid for both evaluation methods. The significant differences between building perception with and without OAs and groups of respondents were found only for the building with good facade quality. While, in the case of low-quality buildings the perception of the urban landscape was low regardless of the presence of OAs. Moreover, we can primarily conclude that city audit and survey of public opinion can be used interchangeably.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.bibliographyil., bibliogr.
dc.description.financepublication_nocost
dc.description.financecost0,00
dc.description.if3,9
dc.description.points140
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume14
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-024-56403-9
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttps://sciencerep.up.poznan.pl/handle/item/4164
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-56403-9
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reports
dc.relation.pagesart. 6138
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.sciencecloudsend
dc.share.typeOPEN_JOURNAL
dc.titleUrban visual pollution: comparison of two ways of evaluation - a case study from Europe
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.volume14