Comparison of the Foraging Activity of Bats in Coniferous, Mixed, and Deciduous Managed Forests

cris.lastimport.scopus2025-10-23T06:56:24Z
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-4504-1696
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-7501-0698
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-8514-5449
cris.virtual.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidd954e880-1b29-4b55-946b-90bff8de1c4c
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidc671b535-8e33-4b73-bd7d-52c58052b924
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid0e58100d-9317-4213-93ad-a314751fcd69
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.abstract.enThe aim of this study was to compare the foraging activity of bats in coniferous, deciduous, and mixed forests and to test whether this activity was subject to seasonal variation. Sample points were selected in stands of similar spatial structure in coniferous (Pinus sylvestris L.), in mixed (Pinus sylvestris and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.), and in deciduous (Quercus petraea) managed forests in western Poland. Bat calls were recorded using automated ultrasound recording devices (Batcorder 3.0, ecoObs, Nürnberg, Germany) during five consecutive nights from May to September in each of the six stands. A total of 4250 bat passes were recorded. Overall, 63.1% of bat passes were identified to species, 31.6% were identified to genus or sonotype group, and 5.3% remained unidentified. In total, eight species of bats and seven sonotype groups were recorded. The dominant species in all types of forests were Pipistrellus pygmaeus (44.5% of recorded bat passes), followed by Nyctalus noctula (10.3%) and Pipistrellus nathusii (5.7%). There were no significant differences in the total activity of bats between the three types of forests; however, high seasonal fluctuations in bat foraging activity were found. This study demonstrates that when coniferous, deciduous, and mixed stands with similar spatial structure are compared, forest type does not affect the foraging activity of bats.
dc.affiliationWydział Rolnictwa, Ogrodnictwa i Biotechnologii
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Urządzania Lasu
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Użytkowania Lasu
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Ekonomiki i Techniki Leśnej
dc.contributor.authorWęgiel, Andrzej
dc.contributor.authorGrzywiński, Witold
dc.contributor.authorJaros, Radosław
dc.contributor.authorŁacka, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.authorWęgiel, Jolanta
dc.date.access2025-09-02
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-02T08:43:37Z
dc.date.available2025-09-02T08:43:37Z
dc.date.copyright2023-02-27
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>The aim of this study was to compare the foraging activity of bats in coniferous, deciduous, and mixed forests and to test whether this activity was subject to seasonal variation. Sample points were selected in stands of similar spatial structure in coniferous (Pinus sylvestris L.), in mixed (Pinus sylvestris and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.), and in deciduous (Quercus petraea) managed forests in western Poland. Bat calls were recorded using automated ultrasound recording devices (Batcorder 3.0, ecoObs, Nürnberg, Germany) during five consecutive nights from May to September in each of the six stands. A total of 4250 bat passes were recorded. Overall, 63.1% of bat passes were identified to species, 31.6% were identified to genus or sonotype group, and 5.3% remained unidentified. In total, eight species of bats and seven sonotype groups were recorded. The dominant species in all types of forests were Pipistrellus pygmaeus (44.5% of recorded bat passes), followed by Nyctalus noctula (10.3%) and Pipistrellus nathusii (5.7%). There were no significant differences in the total activity of bats between the three types of forests; however, high seasonal fluctuations in bat foraging activity were found. This study demonstrates that when coniferous, deciduous, and mixed stands with similar spatial structure are compared, forest type does not affect the foraging activity of bats.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.bibliographyil., bibliogr.
dc.description.financepublication_nocost
dc.description.financecost0,00
dc.description.if2,4
dc.description.number3
dc.description.points100
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume14
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/f14030481
dc.identifier.issn1999-4907
dc.identifier.urihttps://sciencerep.up.poznan.pl/handle/item/4576
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/3/481
dc.languageen
dc.pbn.affiliationagriculture and horticulture
dc.relation.ispartofForests
dc.relation.pagesart. 481
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.sciencecloudnosend
dc.share.typeOPEN_JOURNAL
dc.subject.enChiroptera
dc.subject.enhabitat use
dc.subject.enforest type
dc.subject.enacoustic detection
dc.subject.enbatcorder
dc.titleComparison of the Foraging Activity of Bats in Coniferous, Mixed, and Deciduous Managed Forests
dc.title.volumeSpecial Issue Mixed Species Forests: Risks, Resilience and Management
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.volume14