Optimizing dimensions in furniture design: A literature review
| cris.virtual.author-orcid | #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# | |
| cris.virtual.author-orcid | 0000-0003-0076-3190 | |
| cris.virtual.author-orcid | #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# | |
| cris.virtualsource.author-orcid | fa315390-4497-4227-983d-3772e291284d | |
| cris.virtualsource.author-orcid | be4662f0-4144-45b2-96f7-33f2859e6d5e | |
| cris.virtualsource.author-orcid | #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# | |
| dc.abstract.en | Wooden furniture design necessitates the integration of both technological requirements and aesthetic considerations. To guide designers in achieving this balance, this article explores how established design principles, such as proportions and preferred numerical sequences, can inform decision-making for both technological and aesthetic aspects. The goal is to demonstrate how these principles can be integrated with modern CAD tools. In reviewing the scientific literature, this study compiled and compared mathematical and non-mathematical models that support dimensional decision-making. These models included ancient canons (Egyptian, Greek, and Roman) alongside those of Leonardo da Vinci, Palladio, Dürer, Le Corbusier, Zeising, McCallum, and Brock. Additionally, the article examines numeral systems used in modern technology, such as Renard’s series and convenient numbers. It is proposed that designers should experiment with geometric design templates to achieve balanced proportions. All geometric design principles contribute to aesthetics, creativity and effectiveness in design. The literature identifies two groups of dimensional design templates: organic, inspired by the human body or the Fibonacci sequence, and inorganic, based on numerical order. It’s impossible to pinpoint a single “optimal algorithm” to support dimensional decisions in design. Specific geometric design principles serve as valuable tools, not the ultimate answer. | |
| dc.affiliation | Wydział Leśny i Technologii Drewna | |
| dc.affiliation.institute | Katedra Obrabiarek i Podstaw Konstrukcji Maszyn | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jasińska, Anna | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sydor, Maciej | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hitka, Miloš | |
| dc.date.access | 2024-08-29 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-29T12:21:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-29T12:21:22Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-05-30 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | <jats:p>Wooden furniture design necessitates the integration of both technological requirements and aesthetic considerations. To guide designers in achieving this balance, this article explores how established design principles, such as proportions and preferred numerical sequences, can inform decision-making for both technological and aesthetic aspects. The goal is to demonstrate how these principles can be integrated with modern CAD tools. In reviewing the scientific literature, this study compiled and compared mathematical and non-mathematical models that support dimensional decision-making. These models included ancient canons (Egyptian, Greek, and Roman) alongside those of Leonardo da Vinci, Palladio, Dürer, Le Corbusier, Zeising, McCallum, and Brock. Additionally, the article examines numeral systems used in modern technology, such as Renard’s series and convenient numbers. It is proposed that designers should experiment with geometric design templates to achieve balanced proportions. All geometric design principles contribute to aesthetics, creativity and effectiveness in design. The literature identifies two groups of dimensional design templates: organic, inspired by the human body or the Fibonacci sequence, and inorganic, based on numerical order. It’s impossible to pinpoint a single “optimal algorithm” to support dimensional decisions in design. Specific geometric design principles serve as valuable tools, not the ultimate answer.</jats:p> | |
| dc.description.accesstime | at_publication | |
| dc.description.bibliography | il., bibliogr. | |
| dc.description.finance | publication_nocost | |
| dc.description.financecost | 0,00 | |
| dc.description.if | 1,3 | |
| dc.description.number | 3 | |
| dc.description.points | 100 | |
| dc.description.review | review | |
| dc.description.version | final_published | |
| dc.description.volume | 19 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15376/biores.19.3.4727-4748 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1930-2126 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1930-2126 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://sciencerep.up.poznan.pl/handle/item/1708 | |
| dc.identifier.weblink | https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/resources/optimizing-dimensions-in-furniture-design-a-literature-review/ | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | BioResources | |
| dc.relation.pages | 4727-4748 | |
| dc.rights | CC-BY-SA | |
| dc.sciencecloud | send | |
| dc.share.type | OPEN_JOURNAL | |
| dc.subject.en | decision making | |
| dc.subject.en | design | |
| dc.subject.en | preferred value systems | |
| dc.subject.en | aesthetic and technological evaluation | |
| dc.subject.en | CAD objects | |
| dc.subtype | ReviewArticle | |
| dc.title | Optimizing dimensions in furniture design: A literature review | |
| dc.type | JournalArticle | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 3 | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 19 |