Selected issues of legal soil protection

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-8485-5425
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-2884-0733
cris.virtual.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidb4c5e6f5-8cbc-4868-a478-5cd047623565
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid6abec8b9-e1a4-4055-8e46-8075d2a68be5
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.abstract.enThis article aims to answer the question of whether the solutions adopted in EU and national legislation serve to protect soil health. Although the issues discussed have been addressed by the EU legislator, a uniform legal framework for soil protection has yet to be developed. The “soil monitoring law” directive currently under con-sideration is of fundamental im-portance. In national legislation, the local spatial development plan has remained the pri-mary legal instrument for the prevention of soil degradation for many years. Soils that are properly classified are subject to qualitative (bonitation) classification and are thus formally designated as agricultural land. This is the reference point for determining pollution and re-mediation measures. Ultimately, the authors conclude that a holistic approach to soil protec-tion is still lacking. While the current regulations contain provisions for soil protection, but they imperfect and operate selectively, often disregarding public interest and environmental considerations.
dc.abstract.languageit
dc.abstract.otherL’obiettivo dell’articolo è verificare se le soluzioni adottate nella legislazione dell’Unione Europea e a livello nazionale siano sufficienti a tutelare adeguatamente la salute del suolo. Nonostante tali temi siano stati oggetto di normative europee, manca un quadro giuridico uniforme per la protezione del suolo. In questo contesto, di fondamentale importanza si rivela la direttiva in fase di elaborazione sul “diritto al monitoraggio del suolo”. Alla luce della legislazione nazionale, il piano regolatore locale rimane da anni lo strumento princi-pale per la tutela preventiva del suolo. I suoli correttamente classificati ricevono una valu-tazione qualitativa (agronomica), che ne riconosce formalmente lo status di suolo agricolo e costituisce la base per misure correttive contro l’inquinamento e per la riabilitazione. Gli autori concludono che manca un approccio olistico alla protezione del suolo. Le normative vigenti prevedono soluzioni utili, ma imperfette e selettive, che in casi specifici trascurano l’interesse pubblico e le questioni ambientali in un’ottica complessiva.
dc.affiliationWydział Rolnictwa, Ogrodnictwa i Biotechnologii
dc.affiliationWydział Ekonomiczny
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Gleboznawstwa i Mikrobiologii
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Prawa i Organizacji Przedsiębiorstw w Agrobiznesie
dc.contributor.authorJakubus, Monika
dc.contributor.authorLeśkiewicz, Katarzyna
dc.contributor.authorLipińska, Izabela
dc.date.access2026-01-13
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-13T10:32:53Z
dc.date.available2026-01-13T10:32:53Z
dc.date.copyright2025-12-17
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>This article presents Finnish regulations on food information and attempts to identify those of the solutions presented that could be adopted by Polish legislators. In order to achieve this aim it examines voluntary product origin labelling, the deposit system, alcohol advertising and “GMO-free” labelling. Their analysis leads to the conclusion that Finland has introduced solutions that promote local patriotism and facilitate informed consumer choice by providing detailed information. The author believes that Finnish solutions such as the zero tolerance principle for “GMO-free” labelling and the modern deposit system could serve as good examples for Polish legislators. The introduction of similar solutions in Poland might contribute to improving consumer protection and food quality on the market.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.bibliographybibliogr.
dc.description.financepublication_nocost
dc.description.financecost0,00
dc.description.number2 (37)
dc.description.points70
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.identifier.doi10.14746/ppr.2025.37.2.1
dc.identifier.issn1897-7626
dc.identifier.urihttps://sciencerep.up.poznan.pl/handle/item/6777
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ppr/article/view/50771
dc.languageen
dc.language.otherit
dc.relation.ispartofPRZEGLĄD PRAWA ROLNEGO
dc.relation.pages12-17
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.sciencecloudnosend
dc.share.typeOPEN_JOURNAL
dc.subject.ensoils
dc.subject.endegradation
dc.subject.endevastation
dc.subject.engood agricultural practices
dc.subject.ensoil protection
dc.subject.enre-habilitation
dc.subject.enremediation
dc.subject.languageit
dc.subject.othersuoli
dc.subject.otherdegrado
dc.subject.otherdevastazione
dc.subject.otherbuone pratiche agricole
dc.subject.othersalvaguardia del suo-lo
dc.subject.otherrecupero del suolo
dc.subject.otherbonifica
dc.titleSelected issues of legal soil protection
dc.title.alternativeTutela giuridica del suolo – questioni scelte
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue2(37)