Densification of Delignified Wood: Influence of Chemical Composition on Wood Density, Compressive Strength, and Hardness of Eurasian Aspen and Scots Pine

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-0784-6258
cris.virtual.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtual.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidcb498808-c7f9-4009-837b-6637194c8ce8
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.abstract.enThe densification of solid wood is a well-studied technique that aims to increase the strength and hardness of the material by permanently compressing the wood tissue. To optimise the densification process in this study, a pre-treatment with sodium sulphite was used (delignification). With delignification prior to densification, one achieves higher compression ratios and better mechanical properties compared to densification without pre-treatment. The reactivity of syringyl (dominant in hardwoods) and guaiacyl (dominant in softwoods) lignin towards delignification is different. The influences of this difference on the delignification and densification of softwoods and hardwoods need to be investigated. This study aimed to densify wood after delignification and investigate how variations in chemical composition between coniferous and deciduous species affect the densification process. Scots pine and Eurasian aspen specimens with a similar initial density were investigated to study the influence of the different lignin chemistry in softwoods and hardwoods on the densification process. Both timbers were delignified with sodium sulphite and sodium hydroxide and subsequently densified. While the delignification was twice as efficient in aspen than in pine, the compression ratios were almost identical in both species. The Brinell hardness and compressive strength showed a more significant increase in aspen than in Scots pine; however, one exception was the compressive strength in a radial direction, which increased more effectively in Scots pine. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed the microstructure of densified aspen and Scots pine, showing the crushing and collapse of the cells.
dc.affiliationWydział Leśny i Technologii Drewna
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Nauki o Drewnie i Techniki Cieplnej
dc.article.number892
dc.contributor.authorMania, Przemysław
dc.contributor.authorKupfernagel, Carlo
dc.contributor.authorCurling, Simon
dc.date.access2024-07-22
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-13T11:03:31Z
dc.date.available2024-08-13T11:03:31Z
dc.date.copyright2024-05-21
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>The densification of solid wood is a well-studied technique that aims to increase the strength and hardness of the material by permanently compressing the wood tissue. To optimise the densification process in this study, a pre-treatment with sodium sulphite was used (delignification). With delignification prior to densification, one achieves higher compression ratios and better mechanical properties compared to densification without pre-treatment. The reactivity of syringyl (dominant in hardwoods) and guaiacyl (dominant in softwoods) lignin towards delignification is different. The influences of this difference on the delignification and densification of softwoods and hardwoods need to be investigated. This study aimed to densify wood after delignification and investigate how variations in chemical composition between coniferous and deciduous species affect the densification process. Scots pine and Eurasian aspen specimens with a similar initial density were investigated to study the influence of the different lignin chemistry in softwoods and hardwoods on the densification process. Both timbers were delignified with sodium sulphite and sodium hydroxide and subsequently densified. While the delignification was twice as efficient in aspen than in pine, the compression ratios were almost identical in both species. The Brinell hardness and compressive strength showed a more significant increase in aspen than in Scots pine; however, one exception was the compressive strength in a radial direction, which increased more effectively in Scots pine. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed the microstructure of densified aspen and Scots pine, showing the crushing and collapse of the cells.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.bibliographyil., bibliogr.
dc.description.financepublication_nocost
dc.description.financecost0,00
dc.description.if2,4
dc.description.number6
dc.description.points100
dc.description.reviewreview
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume15
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/f15060892
dc.identifier.issn1999-4907
dc.identifier.urihttps://sciencerep.up.poznan.pl/handle/item/1635
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/15/6/892
dc.languageen
dc.pbn.affiliationforestry
dc.relation.ispartofForests
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.sciencecloudsend
dc.share.typeOPEN_JOURNAL
dc.subject.endelignification
dc.subject.endensification
dc.subject.enguaiacyl
dc.subject.ensyringyl
dc.subject.enhardness
dc.subject.enwood
dc.titleDensification of Delignified Wood: Influence of Chemical Composition on Wood Density, Compressive Strength, and Hardness of Eurasian Aspen and Scots Pine
dc.title.volumeWood Modification: Optimisation and Characterisation of Modified Timbers
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue6
oaire.citation.volume15
project.funder.nameb.d.