Simple item page
 

Effects of two alternative feeding diets on growth, feed efficiency and meat quality in crossbreeding goose populations

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-4644-0111
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-1772-7997
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-3849-4435
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-4233-8803
cris.virtual.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidd3aa317f-f6c6-43ef-a508-ee305375c7c4
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid95e7bfbc-b48c-4cbc-a67b-0c82494d303d
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid7583f283-39ec-4125-9e34-6f6a60d31a2d
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid4207065a-66be-4361-8290-3aa02454b4df
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.abstract.enThis study evaluated the effects of two dietary protein sources - standard soybean meal (SBM) and local protein sources (LPS: yellow lupin and rapeseed meal) - on growth performance, feed efficiency, and meat quality in two goose reciprocal crossbred populations of Eskildsen (E) and Tapphorn (T). The research material consisted of 240 geese (120 from each of the two groups TE and ET). The following traits were recorded: growth, feed intake, feed conversion ratio (FCR), carcass composition, and meat chemical composition, including fatty acid profiles. Results showed that LPS-fed geese had reduced body weight gain (BWG) during the first 28 days; however, this difference diminished over time. While final body weights were similar, cumulative feed intake was higher and FCR less efficient in the LPS group. The TE genotype exhibited superior growth and carcass weights compared to ET, suggesting a maternal heterosis effect. Although protein and mineral content were unaffected, meat from LPS-fed geese had higher polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and lower fat content, indicating potential nutritional benefits. In conclusion, yellow lupin can serve as a viable alternative to SBM in goose diets. On the other hand, effects of population on these studied traits are usually significant. It indicates formulating feeding strategies should be included genetic origin of population.
dc.affiliationWydział Medycyny Weterynaryjnej i Nauk o Zwierzętach
dc.affiliationWydział Nauk o Żywności i Żywieniu
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Genetyki i Podstaw Hodowli Zwierząt​​
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Zarządzania Jakością i Bezpieczeństwem Żywności
dc.affiliation.instituteKatedra Hodowli Zwierząt i Oceny Surowców
dc.contributor.authorDobrzyńska, Patrycja
dc.contributor.authorTomczyk, Łukasz
dc.contributor.authorHejdysz, Marcin
dc.contributor.authorStangierski, Jerzy
dc.contributor.authorSzwaczkowski, Tomasz
dc.date.access2025-10-09
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-09T12:46:18Z
dc.date.available2025-10-09T12:46:18Z
dc.date.copyright2025-10-07
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstract<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>This study evaluated the effects of two dietary protein sources - standard soybean meal (SBM) and local protein sources (LPS: yellow lupin and rapeseed meal) - on growth performance, feed efficiency, and meat quality in two goose reciprocal crossbred populations of Eskildsen (E) and Tapphorn (T). The research material consisted of 240 geese (120 from each of the two groups TE and ET). The following traits were recorded: growth, feed intake, feed conversion ratio (FCR), carcass composition, and meat chemical composition, including fatty acid profiles. Results showed that LPS-fed geese had reduced body weight gain (BWG) during the first 28 days; however, this difference diminished over time. While final body weights were similar, cumulative feed intake was higher and FCR less efficient in the LPS group. The TE genotype exhibited superior growth and carcass weights compared to ET, suggesting a maternal heterosis effect. Although protein and mineral content were unaffected, meat from LPS-fed geese had higher polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and lower fat content, indicating potential nutritional benefits. In conclusion, yellow lupin can serve as a viable alternative to SBM in goose diets. On the other hand, effects of population on these studied traits are usually significant. It indicates formulating feeding strategies should be included genetic origin of population.</jats:p>
dc.description.accesstimeat_publication
dc.description.bibliographybibliogr.
dc.description.financepublication_nocost
dc.description.financecost0,00
dc.description.if1,1
dc.description.number3
dc.description.points100
dc.description.versionfinal_published
dc.description.volume43
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/aspr-2025-0020
dc.identifier.eissn2300-8342
dc.identifier.issn0860-4037
dc.identifier.urihttps://sciencerep.up.poznan.pl/handle/item/5356
dc.identifier.weblinkhttps://reference-global.com/article/10.2478/aspr-2025-0020
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Science Papers and Reports
dc.relation.pages283-300
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.sciencecloudnosend
dc.share.typeOPEN_JOURNAL
dc.subject.encrossbreeding
dc.subject.enmeat quality
dc.subject.enprotein sources
dc.subject.enyellow lupine
dc.titleEffects of two alternative feeding diets on growth, feed efficiency and meat quality in crossbreeding goose populations
dc.typeJournalArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.volume43